Jul 172012
 

Homeopaths continually demonstrate that they have no real understanding of morality:

A consortium of pharmaceutical companies in Germany have been paying a journalist €43,000 to run a set of web sites that denigrates an academic who has published research into  their products.

These companies, who make homeopathic sugar pills, were exposed in the German newspaper Süddeutsche Zeitung in an article, Schmutzige Methoden der sanften Medizin (The Dirty Tricks of Alternative Medicine.)

Disgusting.

The victim of the attacks, Edzard Ernst, was instrumental, alongside Simon Singh, to further highlight the bogus nature of the foundations of chiropractic treatments in 2009.

Article by Kulvinder Singh Matharu – 2012

Apr 232012
 

DC’s Improbable Science details the rather strange false claim from London Chiropractor on their UCL endorsement:

It must be said, though, that some chiropractors are abandoning the bogus subluxation pseudoscientific explanations and moving towards a more rational and beneficial method of treatment, so I wouldn’t want to tar all chiropractors with the same brush.

Article by Kulvinder Singh Matharu – 2012

Dec 302011
 

Sam Homola recently posted an article at Science-Based Medicine where he describes his attempts to remove pseudoscience (i.e. subluxations) from chiropractic so as to provide treatments that provide legitimate effective treatment for back pain. It can be hoped that Homola succeeds but he has been at this since the early 1960s and progress has been slow. Chiropractic continues to be seen as quackery, as something that is bogus, by those who apply rationality and will continue to be so until chiropractic changes itself. Homola’s article is at:

Article by Kulvinder Singh Matharu – 2011

Oct 142011
 

Bunch of stuff from The Quackometer which I’ve only just got round to read.

1. The MHRA is not an effective organisation. Far from it:

MHRA accused of “clothing naked quackery”
http://www.quackometer.net/blog/2011/09/mhra-accused-of-clothing-naked-quackery.html

duck

2. Misled graduates in career hurdle:

McTimoney Chiropractic College in Deep Trouble
http://www.quackometer.net/blog/2011/10/mctimoney-chiropractic-college-in-deep-trouble.html

neck

3. The ASA struggles with clamping down on homeopathic advertising abuse. Perhaps the ASA need a greater regulatory standing and enforcement powers:

The Advertising Regulator Struggles with Homeopaths
http://www.quackometer.net/blog/2011/10/asa-struggles-with-homeopaths.html

death

And some related and interesting here’s stuff from elsewhere that I’m also catching up with:

Article by Kulvinder Singh Matharu – 2011

Nov 012010
 

Quackometer article on chiropractors attacking their own regulator:

Chiropractic is based on quackery but I am aware that some are trying to distance themselves from the quackery nonsense and move to a more scientific approach; perhaps in the same way that modern chemistry moved on from its alchemy roots. But the time for chiropractic to reach that stage of credibility and maturity is some way off as, at least in the UK, many chiropractors have made unfounded and demonstrably false claims for curing various ailments.

Article by Kulvinder Singh Matharu – 2010

Jul 292009
 

spine reprinted from Sense About Science

free debate

Simon Singh is a science writer in London and the co-author, with Edzard Ernst, of Trick or Treatment? Alternative Medicine on Trial. This is an edited version of an article published in The Guardian for which Singh is being personally sued for libel by the British Chiropractic Association.

Beware the spinal trap

Some practitioners claim it is a cure-all, but the research suggests chiropractic therapy has mixed results – and can even be lethal, says Simon Singh.

You might be surprised to know that the founder of chiropractic therapy, Daniel David Palmer, wrote that ’99% of all diseases are caused by displaced vertebrae’. In the 1860s, Palmer began to develop his theory that the spine was involved in almost every illness because the spinal cord connects the brain to the rest of the body. Therefore any misalignment could cause a problem in distant parts of the body.

In fact, Palmer’s first chiropractic intervention supposedly cured a man who had been profoundly deaf for 17 years. His second treatment was equally strange, because he claimed that he treated a patient with heart trouble by correcting a displaced vertebra.

You might think that modern chiropractors restrict themselves to treating back problems, but in fact some still possess quite wacky ideas. The fundamentalists argue that they can cure anything, including helping treat children with colic, sleeping and feeding problems, frequent ear infections, asthma and prolonged crying – even though there is not a jot of evidence.

I can confidently label these assertions as utter nonsense because I have co-authored a book about alternative medicine with the world’s first professor of complementary medicine, Edzard Ernst. He learned chiropractic techniques himself and used them as a doctor. This is when he began to see the need for some critical evaluation. Among other projects, he examined the evidence from 70 trials exploring the benefits of chiropractic therapy in conditions unrelated to the back. He found no evidence to suggest that chiropractors could treat any such conditions.

But what about chiropractic in the context of treating back problems? Manipulating the spine can cure some problems, but results are mixed. To be fair, conventional approaches, such as physiotherapy, also struggle to treat back problems with any consistency. Nevertheless, conventional therapy is still preferable because of the serious dangers associated with chiropractic.

Continue reading »

Jun 102009
 

neck Following the recent coverage on chiropractic, The Quackometer article http://www.quackometer.net/blog/2009/06/chiropractors-told-to-take-down-their.html reports on an astounding letter sent from the McTimoney Association to all its members. In a nutshell, it appears that chiropractors are running scared…running scared that the public are about to found out the truth that chiropractic is a pseudoscience.

There are several points in the letter that can be used as a window into the mindset of chiropractors and these are discussed at http://www.quackometer.net/blog/2009/06/chiropractors-told-to-take-down-their.html. Utterly amazing!

Article by Kulvinder Singh Matharu – 2009

Jun 042009
 

My view on chiropractic is simple…it has been shown that chiropractic is based on non-scientific ideas, and various studies and trials reinforce that position. In other words, trials indicate that chiropractic is "bogus".spine

The recent situation with Simon Singh has rattled my cage, so to speak, and I have included some links here regarding the current situation…which I see very much as a fight of reason against superstition and nonsense. Much like homeopathy and other pseudosciences, we need to be on the guard against the new witch doctors.

The truth may be puzzling. It may take some work to grapple with. It may be counterintuitive. It may contradict deeply held prejudices. It may not be consonant with what we desperately want to be true. But our preferences do not determine what’s true. We have a method, and that method helps us to reach not absolute truth, only asymptotic approaches to the truth – never there, just closer and closer, always finding vast new oceans of undiscovered possibilities. Cleverly designed experiments are the key. – Carl Sagan

Simon Singh: principled and brave
http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2009/06/simon_singh_principled_and_bra.php

The Law Has No Place in Scientific Disputes
http://thinking-is-dangerous.blogspot.com/2009/06/law-has-no-place-in-scientific-disputes.html

Singh the blues
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/06/03/singh-the-blues/

Simon Singh to Appeal Bogus Decision
http://www.quackometer.net/blog/2009/06/simon-singh-to-appeal-bogus-decision.html

Simon Singh is appealing!
http://www.randi.org/site/index.php/swift-blog/585-simon-singh-is-appealing.html

Simon Singh to appeal libel decision
http://gimpyblog.wordpress.com/2009/06/04/simon-singh-to-appeal-libel-decision/

Chiropractic – as modest today as in 1913?
http://gimpyblog.wordpress.com/2009/06/04/chiropractic-as-modest-today-as-in-1913/

Simon Singh will appeal! Keep the Libel Laws out of Science
http://www.dcscience.net/?p=1630

Silenced, the writer who dared to say chiropractice is bogus
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/silenced-the-writer-who-dared-to-say-chiropractice-is-bogus-1696408.html

Review of libel law called for by comedians
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/article6426195.ece

Science writer will appeal libel case ruling
http://www.nature.com/news/2009/090603/full/news.2009.542.html

Singh plans to appeal ruling in libel case
http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=26&storycode=406872&c=1

Britain Chills Free Speech
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124406714025182743.html

Chiropractic: a bogus treatment for bedwetting?
http://apgaylard.wordpress.com/2009/05/21/chiropractic-a-bogus-treatment-for-bedwetting/

Simon Singh and the Bogus Chiropractic Association
http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2009/05/19/simon-singh-and-the-bogus-chiropractic-association/

Simon Singh loses first round in chiropractic fight – May 08, 2009
http://blogs.nature.com/news/thegreatbeyond/2009/05/simon_singh_loses_first_round.html

Singh Case Update: A Real Pain in the Neck!
http://godknowswhat.wordpress.com/2009/05/07/singh-case-update-a-real-pain-in-the-neck/

How I Really Feel About Chiropractors
http://www.rebuildyourback.com/chiropractic/myopinion.php

Chiropractic Health Care: Science or Religion?
http://www.geocities.com/forbidden_area/chiro.html

ChiroWatch
http://www.chirowatch.com/

free debate

Feb 012009
 

Although I have generally focused on homeopaths, and even though there has been some progress in addressing pseudoscience in some UK universities, Quackometer reminded me that there are a bunch of other pseudosciences out there that appear to be accepted by the public at large. In particular, Quackometer’s article discusses the current status of chiropractic.

The problem with chiropractic is that its foundations are based on non-scientific ideas; ideas  which are still taught. Current chiropractors either don’t care or sincerely believe in what they’ve been taught even though there is no scientific evidential support, and studies show no real benefit in the practice. Either way, both scenarios scare me, especially as X-rays are being used.

I would not want to be treated by a chiropractor. Would you?

Copyright © 2009 Kulvinder Singh Matharu – All Rights Reserved