Jan 292013
 

Another thoughtful and insightful article from Eric MacDonald, this time on the reaction of Medhi Hasan after he had interviewed Richard Dawkins:

The problem is with Hasan himself, of course. He has bought into a superstition; the delusion this brings stops him from responding rationally. Further, it is clear from MacDonald’s article that Hasan is already well on the path of barbarity and injustice.

I will belittle Hasan and his irrationality for the same reason that I would belittle adults who claim that Santa Claus is real or who insist that there are fairies living at the bottom of the garden. But I would do so to a greater extent to Hasan due to the evil that will result from what he says.

Here’s a good talk on why it matters to challenge delusion and irrationality:

Article by Kulvinder Singh Matharu – 2013

Dec 122012
 

There’s a Washington Post article that has also been reprinted in part at richarddawkins.net. Both are shown below.

The seven countries where the state can execute you for being atheist:

  1. http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2012/12/10/the-seven-countries-where-the-state-can-execute-you-for-being-atheist/
  2. http://richarddawkins.net/news_articles/2012/12/12/the-seven-countries-where-the-state-can-execute-you-for-being-atheist

Whilst the map in the Washington Post article certainly shows that the more extreme forms of discrimination and persecution against non-believers are in Islamic states, it fails to show the subtle undercurrent of discrimination found in other states such as the Republic of Ireland and the US state of Arkansas, for example, where laws may preclude you from taking part in the democratic process or be refused proper medical care. Additionally, other forms of indirect discrimination arise where special concessions and privileges are granted to religious groups thereby unfairly disadvantaging non-believers. The referenced International Humanist and Ethical Union (IHEU) report “Freedom of Thought 2012 Global Report on Discrimination Atheists and the Nonreligious” provides a far more detailed and balanced picture of the extent of discrimination and persecution against non-believers. The list of guilty states may surprise you.

Further details on the IHEU report can be found at their website:

Article by Kulvinder Singh Matharu – 2012

Dec 022012
 

Further to a recent post on Steiner Waldorf schools, Quackometer has posted a couple of articles on the obfuscation practised by those schools, and the results of the investigations by the BBC et al:

The education of our children should not be left in the hands of those steeped in nonsense, superstition and the occult. There is enough unreason already in this world without more sewage being poured over the impressionable and the vulnerable. The level of indoctrination practised by these schools does not appear to be as overt as those of other religious schools but the nature of the risks needs to be understood.

An extensive resource is here for those wanting to research more:

I, of course, have similar objections to other religious schools but the need to highlight the nature of the Steiner Waldorf schools required prioritising as not everyone is aware what these schools are all about.

Article by Kulvinder Singh Matharu – 2012

Oct 212012
 

Not sure how I missed this one:

I’d already blogged at http://www.metalvortex.com/blog/2012/02/14/755.html that Warsi is not a force for good:

She wants irrationality to become ubiquitous. She stands for all that is backwards and medieval in thinking and outlook. It is perhaps the religious like her that are the real danger to civilisation.

Jerry A. Coyne’s Feb 2012 article on Warsi is well worth a read:

I wonder what more garbage will spew from her mouth and the harm she will cause.

Article by Kulvinder Singh Matharu – 2012

Jul 172012
 

Eric MacDonald is absolutely right on this.

It is clear that those who keep harping on that “without religion there are no morals” have not exactly thought things through. It is plain that morals have evolved as we have evolved, grown and formed communities; it is our built-in morals, adapted somewhat to environmental factors, that allows us to function together.

There can be cases that someone can rule a district or a country with ruthlessness, someone who justifies such actions on having a strong country, or perhaps someone who does so in the name of a god. Such persons, or organisations, cannot last. Religion is certainly one such organisation. Religions have inflicted injustices, cruelties and barbarity. As I’ve said in other articles, religion is a moral façade:

Quote:

Religion, contrary to the naivety expressed by some, cannot lay claim to morality. Religion is a source of enslavement, a source of inequality, a source of barbarity. Humans, as a community-based species, have derived morality from within itself, from within the community, influenced by the social interactions that takes place. And morality changes, progresses, as communities advance. But religion stakes a claim on morality, claims itself as a source of morality, and distorts it for its own means. Here we are, in the 21st century, with the inhumanity and unreason of religion exposed by advances in science and by application of critical thinking. Religion has not only passed its sell-by-date but was defective when conceived and manufactured. Let’s move on and free ourselves.

Religion enslaves. And religion kills, by Kulvinder Singh Matharu

http://www.metalvortex.com/blog/2011/04/02/596.html

We’ve known religion when it held vast power, when it abused that power and committed vast horrors. Let us not be seduced by whatever gifts they claim to offer, let us not be conned into believing that they command the moral landscape.

Article by Kulvinder Singh Matharu – 2012

Jun 142012
 

Indonesian atheist faces a jail sentence for challenging Islam. It may be that the sentence gets suspended or perhaps he may get a very draconian punishment. But it’s clear that religion poisons.

http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2012/06/14/dont-diss-gods-in-indonesia/

Indonesian atheist faces possible jail time

Mechanisms protecting religion or giving religion special privileges will result in injustice, barbarity, and loss of freedom. Evil is what evil does; this incident in Indonesia is a good example.

Article by Kulvinder Singh Matharu – 2012

Jun 102012
 

More religious evil, this time highlighted by ZOMGitCriss:

Raping Islam

Religion is a force for control, for suppression, and for barbarity, clothed in dogmas and rituals which the religious hope is mistaken for civility and progress, shielded by the mock claims of “offence” and “racism”. I am tolerant of religion (I don’t go around threatening people for a start) and adults can believe in whatever fairy-tales they wish (and I will judge their competency on rationality accordingly) but I am against those fairy-tales if the religious enforce indoctrinations onto children, when they threaten liberty and free speech, when they threaten and commit violence, and when they encourage a closed-mind view. Religion will abuse, it has a proven track record. – Kulvinder Matharu

Article by Kulvinder Singh Matharu – 2012

May 212012
 

There comes a time when it’s clear that only the delusional or the deceitful claim evidence for their case when, in reality, said evidence indicates the opposite. Homeopaths and proponents of homeopathy have exhibited such delusional/deceitful behaviours regularly. The Quackometer and Zeno’s Blog describe the most recent of these behaviours:

Article by Kulvinder Singh Matharu – 2012

Apr 202012
 

Another terrific Eric MacDonald article:

I’ve said myself that religion deserves to be mocked; it is the refuge for the intolerant, for the unenlightened, for the irrational, for the racists, for the homophobes, for the barbarous, for the ignorant, and for the tyrants.

I’ve repeated these quotes already in another article but worth repeating again, and again and again:

Quote:

I will criticise all religions and the religious where they come into conflict with ideals such as reason, rationality, freedom, equality and justice. History has shown that religions will suppress such ideals through use and abuse of whatever powers and controls they have.

Quote:

It’s quite simple. The religious are not at all comfortable in their delusions and instinctively lash out at those that expose the irrationality and fragility of the religious mind. So much for turning the other cheek!

Quote:

Religion needs people to be uneducated, to be unquestioning, to be stupid and credulous. This is how religion exerts itself and how it continues to enslave people into backwards thinking. Jerry Coyne explains this quite clearly in the recent “Be stupid” command from Pope Benedict XVI of the Roman Catholic Church.

Quote:

Religion is institutionalised delusion, a social grouping mechanism for the irrational. But for those within this group who dare to explore with open minds, with the tools of critical thinking, there is hope of a life free from the prisons and poisons of religion.

Quote:

Religion, contrary to the naivety expressed by some, cannot lay claim to morality. Religion is a source of enslavement, a source of inequality, a source of barbarity. Humans, as a community-based species, have derived morality from within itself, from within the community, influenced by the social interactions that takes place. And morality changes, progresses, as communities advance. But religion stakes a claim on morality, claims itself as a source of morality, and distorts it for its own means. Here we are, in the 21st century, with the inhumanity and unreason of religion exposed by advances in science and by application of critical thinking. Religion has not only passed its sell-by-date but was defective when conceived and manufactured. Let’s move on and free ourselves.

Quote:

Science is the search for truth. It is a rational mechanism that uses logic, evidence and other facts to formulate theories to arrive at the truth. Religion is at odds with this rationality and thus those who advocate religion are deluded. And those scientists who claim compatibly of religion with truth in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary must do a pretty good job of compartmentalising the irrationality of religion from their rational thoughts. But, then, humans are not always consistent or rational in what they do which makes the scientific process an absolutely critical method to progress.

Religion is not compatible with truth. Religion is an intellectual prison, a method of control, a method of suppression and repression, which blinds the religious to the truth. It’s about time humanity broke free of its shackles, to experience the truth, to experience the excitement, wonders and mysteries of this planet and the universe.

Quote:

…religion does not deserve any special privileges; it is not immune to criticism and I will object to any laws or “politically correct” influences that seek to protect religion or not cause “offence”. Any “offences” that religious people feel, I think, may be the result of a deep split within their personalities where their rational-self is trying to get to the surface but is pushed back down by the irrational-self. This battle probably goes unnoticed by the person but if they really thought about it they may perhaps know that there’s something not quite right. And rather than explore and understand and admit that they are wrong they, instead, lash out at the external, the rationalists, the critical thinkers. They want this nice, cosy world that they’ve built around themselves and are afraid to venture out, afraid to grow-up, afraid to confront reality.

Quote:

…religion is used as the canvas and as the brush to paint a veil of terror

Article by Kulvinder Singh Matharu – 2012

Apr 132012
 

Well, you could think of Mormonism and its Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints as a joke. Or you can think of them as an evil and hateful organisation. Full of nonsense, full of injustice, full of hatred. Here’s an example:

Article by Kulvinder Singh Matharu – 2012