Novice monks in Pindaya, Shan State, Myanmar (Burma). This place also had the biggest mosquitoes that I’ve ever seen; so big that I didn’t recognise the little blighters until they started biting and, by then, it was far too late to apply any insect repellent! Photo taken in December 2014.
Some more photos of Myanmar from my last trip. They can all be found at http://www.silentnomad.com/images/Photos/Myanmar/
It was April 2011, just after dusk, and we made our way to a restaurant in central Baghdad along Abu Nawas Street by the River Tigris. This area is well known for serving Iraq’s favourite fish dish…the “mazgouf”.
The restaurant, although having a roof, is open to the elements and was filled with many customers; obviously a popular place.
Having selected our live carp (allegedly from the adjacent Tigris but more probably from a fish farm), the cook removed the fish from the tank and then stunned them with a stick, gutted them by cutting along the back, applied some seasoning, and then impaled them to be slow-grilled next to an open fire of burning fruit tree branches such as from lemon trees and orange trees. What we didn’t realise was that it takes about an hour or so to cook the fish, so we had a lot of time to chat!
Carp are bottom feeders and if they were from the Tigris around Baghdad then I’m not sure that I’d have too many fish dinners; there has just been too much dumped in the river following the recent war. Once I’d got past wondering where the fish came from, I did enjoy the meal. I’m not a real fish eater so I can’t say it was a fantastic meal. It was good for sure but I certainly wasn’t jumping up and down in delight. Many would disagree with me and defend the fish. That’s fine. We all have different tastes, literally!
But the mazgouf is an important dish to the Iraqis and the Iraqi diaspora, and it helps to unite them through social gatherings and reinforce their identity and uniqueness; something that’s very much needed in these trying times.
I was recently reviewing some of my photos from Iraq and found one that I thought deserved to be put online, not living just a number of bits on my hard disc.
I’m not entirely sure what this is but I came across it in northern Iraq whilst heading towards the oil fields.
If you know what it is, please let me know!
Disused boilers at an abandoned whaling station on Deception Island, Antarctica. Photo taken in December 2007.
The American Society of Media Photographers, ASMP, has issued some information on Facebook’s proposed T&Cs and how that could impact on photographers.
Most of that information is pretty good but they may have over-estimated their power to influence Facebook. I could be wrong.
What did I do? I kept my Facebook account but removed content and other information about myself except for my name and e-mail address. So I continue to use Facebook for discussions, etc. and provide external links if I need to reference my content; that content was retained and maintained at my main website as it’s the universal primary source for access to my content.
So my recommendation is to continue using Facebook for social interactions and engaging with customers but keep content in a different place that can be URLed. This was easy for me, but then I don’t run a business using Facebook. I suspect, though, that professional photographers who use Facebook as an integral part of their business may experience a number of difficulties. Hopefully other groups can provide further practical advice.
Went out for a cycle ride this evening on my mountain bike and caught this view just before sunset.
Perhaps I’m being paranoid, but I’ve noticed that Facebook, contrary to its previous behaviour, now strips metadata from photos uploaded to its site and that it does not replicate the metadata to describe the photos when viewing within Facebook. I have several problems with this. But two of these stand out;
- One is that it’s a big inconvenience adding descriptions, titles etc. to the photos within Facebook after having already added all those details in the original photo metadata.
- The second is that this seems to be a preparation for a land grab on our photos by Facebook, or at least make it easy for others to steal our photos. With copyright and other photo ownership details removed from photos, Facebook, or others, could claim that these photos are “orphans” and then make commercial use of the photos with no credit or restitution given to the legitimate owners.
Am I being paranoid? This is what others think:
- Study exposes social media sites that delete photographs’ metadata
- Share Beware, Social Media & Metadata
- Who is Stripping Your Metadata?
- Social Media Networks Stripping Data from Your Digital Photos
- Please stop stripping our metadata
I have a Google+ account and I just checked today’s uploaded photos there; Google does remove a lot of the metadata from the photo but it does include a metadata tag for “Artist” with my name, so that’s better than Facebook. Also, the text accompanying the photo within Google+ seems to include most of the relevant metadata tag values. So Google wins here over Facebook, at least for now!